using Admin.NET.Plugin.AiDOP.Service.S8;
using Xunit;

namespace Admin.NET.Plugin.AiDOP.Tests.S8;

/// <summary>
/// S8-RULE-4TAB-1：审核来源<b>只读</b>呈现。
///
/// <para><b>本批刻意不做的事</b>（产品决策已锁定）：不新建 Rule 级 Reviewer Pool、
/// 不改 ApproverType、不动审批流节点、不改 owner/escalate 业务语义。
/// 这些"不做"必须被测试守住 —— 否则下一个人很容易顺手"补全"一个 reviewer_user_ids，
/// 于是同一个问题又出现两套 authority。</para>
///
/// <para><b>为什么要做这个只读视图</b>：规则页此前把审核人显示为「主管」，
/// 而系统里根本不存在组织主管关系（<c>SysOrg.DirectorId</c> 与
/// <c>SysUser.ManagerUserId</c> 实测填充率均为 0）。管理员据此以为审核链是通的，
/// 实际上 UAT 租户的复核流程审批人在本租户下解析为 0 人、
/// 升级流程三个节点全部指向默认租户的一个演示账号。</para>
/// </summary>
public class S8ReviewSourceTests
{
    private static readonly string PluginRoot =
        Path.GetFullPath(Path.Combine(AppContext.BaseDirectory, "../../../../Admin.NET.Plugin.AiDOP"));

    private static string CodeOnly(string relativePath)
    {
        var full = Path.Combine(PluginRoot, relativePath.Replace('/', Path.DirectorySeparatorChar));
        Assert.True(File.Exists(full), $"源码文件不存在，路径需同步更新：{full}");
        return string.Join('\n', File.ReadAllLines(full)
            .Where(l =>
            {
                var t = l.TrimStart();
                return !t.StartsWith("///", StringComparison.Ordinal)
                       && !t.StartsWith("//", StringComparison.Ordinal);
            }));
    }

    // ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
    // 节点解析：宽松读取，认不出就说不知道，绝不猜
    // ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

    /// <summary>真实流程定义（UAT 租户 EXCEPTION_CLOSURE 的实际 JSON 形态）能被解出。</summary>
    [Fact]
    public void ParseApproverNodes_ReadsRealFlowShape()
    {
        const string json = """
        {"nodes":[{"nodeKey":"n1","nodeName":"负责人确认","approverType":2,"approverIds":"1300000000101,1300000000888"}]}
        """;
        var nodes = S8ReviewSourceService.ParseApproverNodes(json);
        Assert.Single(nodes);
        Assert.Equal("负责人确认", nodes[0].NodeName);
        Assert.Equal(2, nodes[0].Type);                    // ApproverTypeEnum.Role
        Assert.Equal("1300000000101,1300000000888", nodes[0].Ids);
    }

    /// <summary>嵌套结构同样能找到节点（流程定义的外层结构由 ApprovalFlow 插件决定，不该写死）。</summary>
    [Fact]
    public void ParseApproverNodes_WalksNestedStructures()
    {
        const string json = """
        {"flow":{"children":[{"branches":[[{"nodeName":"厂级审批","approverType":1,"approverIds":"789819678195781"}]]}]}}
        """;
        var nodes = S8ReviewSourceService.ParseApproverNodes(json);
        Assert.Single(nodes);
        Assert.Equal("厂级审批", nodes[0].NodeName);
        Assert.Equal(1, nodes[0].Type);                    // SpecificUser
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// 空 / 无审批人的定义解出 0 个节点，<b>不抛异常</b>。
    /// 上层会显示「本租户没有该流程」，而不是崩在配置页上。
    /// </summary>
    [Theory]
    [InlineData(null)]
    [InlineData("")]
    [InlineData("   ")]
    [InlineData("""{"nodes":[]}""")]
    [InlineData("""{"nodes":[{"nodeName":"仅抄送"}]}""")]
    public void ParseApproverNodes_HandlesEmptyGracefully(string? json)
    {
        Assert.Empty(S8ReviewSourceService.ParseApproverNodes(json));
    }

    /// <summary>认不出的 approverType 一律跳过，不猜成某个默认值。</summary>
    [Fact]
    public void ParseApproverNodes_SkipsUnrecognizedApproverType()
    {
        const string json = """
        {"nodes":[{"nodeName":"怪节点","approverType":{"weird":true},"approverIds":"x"},
                  {"nodeName":"正常","approverType":2,"approverIds":"ROLE_X"}]}
        """;
        var nodes = S8ReviewSourceService.ParseApproverNodes(json);
        Assert.Single(nodes);
        Assert.Equal("正常", nodes[0].NodeName);
    }

    /// <summary>字符串形式的 approverType 也接受（不同版本的流程设计器写法不一）。</summary>
    [Fact]
    public void ParseApproverNodes_AcceptsStringApproverType()
    {
        const string json = """{"nodes":[{"nodeName":"n","approverType":"Role","approverIds":"ROLE_A"}]}""";
        var nodes = S8ReviewSourceService.ParseApproverNodes(json);
        Assert.Single(nodes);
        Assert.Equal(2, nodes[0].Type);
    }

    // ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
    // 只读边界：本批锁定的"不做"必须被守住
    // ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

    /// <summary>
    /// 审核来源服务<b>绝不写库</b>，也不新建 reviewer 概念。
    ///
    /// <para>产品决策：不新建 Rule 级 Reviewer Pool、不改 ApproverType、不动流程节点。
    /// 这条守卫防的是下一个人"顺手补全"—— 一旦出现 reviewer_user_ids，
    /// 审核人就有了两个 authority，而现有审批流那套还在跑。</para>
    /// </summary>
    [Fact]
    public void ReviewSource_IsStrictlyReadOnly()
    {
        var code = CodeOnly("Service/S8/S8ReviewSourceService.cs");

        foreach (var write in new[] { "AsInsertable", "AsUpdateable", "AsDeleteable", "ExecuteCommandAsync", "InsertAsync", "UpdateAsync" })
            Assert.DoesNotContain(write, code);

        foreach (var invented in new[] { "ReviewerPool", "reviewer_user_ids", "ReviewerUserIds", "IS8ReviewerPool" })
            Assert.DoesNotContain(invented, code);
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// 「主管」这类没有真实实体支持的文案不得出现在审核展示里。
    ///
    /// <para>系统里 <c>SysOrg.DirectorId</c> 与 <c>SysUser.ManagerUserId</c> 填充率均为 0，
    /// 显示「主管」等于告诉管理员一个不存在的东西在负责审核。</para>
    /// </summary>
    [Fact]
    public void ReviewSource_DoesNotShowPhantomSupervisor()
    {
        var code = CodeOnly("Service/S8/S8ReviewSourceService.cs");
        Assert.DoesNotContain("主管", code);
        Assert.DoesNotContain("总监", code);

        var page = File.ReadAllText(Path.GetFullPath(Path.Combine(
            PluginRoot, "../../../Web/src/views/aidop/s8/config/S8WatchRuleConfigPage.vue")));
        // 页面里只允许在"说明为什么不用这个词"的注释中出现，可执行模板不得渲染它
        var template = page[page.IndexOf("<template>", StringComparison.Ordinal)..];
        var templateNoComments = System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Replace(
            template, "<!--.*?-->", string.Empty,
            System.Text.RegularExpressions.RegexOptions.Singleline);
        Assert.DoesNotContain("L2_MANAGER", templateNoComments);
        Assert.DoesNotContain("L3_DIRECTOR", templateNoComments);
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// 解析不出人 / 跨租户引用<b>必须显式暴露</b>，不能静默显示成一片空白。
    ///
    /// <para>这正是这个视图存在的意义：让"审核链其实是断的"这件事在页面上看得见。</para>
    /// </summary>
    [Fact]
    public void ReviewSource_SurfacesBrokenApproverChains()
    {
        var code = CodeOnly("Service/S8/S8ReviewSourceService.cs");
        Assert.Contains("ResolvesToNobody", code);
        Assert.Contains("CrossTenantRefs", code);
        Assert.Contains("解析不出任何审批人", code);
        Assert.Contains("属于其它租户", code);
        // 解析失败要说"无法确定"，不能装作"没有审批人"
        Assert.Contains("无法解析", code);
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// 复核环节必须说清楚：真正决定审核人的是提交复核时手选的账号，
    /// 审批流节点只同步状态。
    ///
    /// <para>不说清楚的话，管理员会去改流程配置然后发现毫无效果。</para>
    /// </summary>
    [Fact]
    public void ReviewSource_ExplainsVerifierIsChosenAtSubmitTime()
    {
        var code = CodeOnly("Service/S8/S8ReviewSourceService.cs");
        Assert.Contains("verifier_user_id", code);
        Assert.Contains("不决定", code);
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// 四页签弹窗<b>不包含</b>「异常操作权限」——它是 S8 全局配置，
    /// 放进规则弹窗会让管理员以为改的是这条规则的权限，实际改的是全租户。
    /// </summary>
    [Fact]
    public void RuleDialog_DoesNotEmbedGlobalActionPermission()
    {
        var page = File.ReadAllText(Path.GetFullPath(Path.Combine(
            PluginRoot, "../../../Web/src/views/aidop/s8/config/S8WatchRuleConfigPage.vue")));
        Assert.DoesNotContain("actionPermissions", page);
        Assert.DoesNotContain("action-permissions", page);

        // 四个页签齐全。S8-RESPONSIBILITY-POOL-1 把后两个改名为业务语言：
        // 「处理与审核」→「责任分配」（谁处理/谁复核/超时找谁），
        // 「通知与升级」→「通知设置」（升级责任已在责任分配里配，此处只管提醒开关）。
        foreach (var tab in new[] { "规则信息", "运行设置", "责任分配", "通知设置" })
            Assert.Contains($"label=\"{tab}\"", page);
        Assert.Equal(4, System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Matches(page, "<el-tab-pane ").Count);
    }
}